2021/05/05 - LAND USE - VAR - Land Use Variance - VAR-21-03

Home Browse Search

VAR-21-03: Baker March 31, 2021 - Purpose:Shoreland residential areas are "lands adjacent to lakes, rivers, and streams in Burnett County...historically prone to development pressure". - Primary Goal:To establish "appropriate strategies for management of future development of these areas that address: ensuring environmental quality, maintaining views and open space, maintaining community character, and potential recreational activity conflicts". - Preferred Use: "Residential uses that are compatible with their immediate surroundings." Possible items to resolve/address: - Concerns brought before the Board from other parties (neighbors, public,Town of Wood River, state agencies,other county departments, etc). Correspondence(written)received as of the date of report compilation: - None. Three Step Variance Test: To qualify for a variance,the applicant must demonstrate that their property meets the following three requirements. 1- Unique property limitations—Unique physical limitations of the property such as steep slopes or wetlands that are not generally shared by other properties must prevent compliance with ordinance requirements. The circumstances of an applicant (growing family, need for a larger garage, etc) are not a factor in deciding variances. Nearby ordinance violations, prior variances or lack of objections from neighbors do not provide a basis for granting a variance. Property limitations that prevent ordinance compliance and are common to a number of properties should be addressed by amending the ordinance. 2- No Harm to Public Interests—A variance may not be granted which results in harm to public interests. In applying this test,the Committee must consider the impacts of the proposal and the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interests of the neighbors,the entire community and the general public. These interests may include: • Public health,safety and welfare • Water Quality • Fish and wildlife habitat • Natural scenic beauty • Minimization of property damages • Provision of efficient public facilities and utilities • Achievement of eventual compliance for nonconforming uses, structures and lot • Any other public interest issues 3- Unnecessary hardship—An applicant may not claim unnecessary hardship because of conditions which are self-imposed or created by a prior owner(for example:excavating a pond on a vacant lot and then arguing that there is no suitable location for a home). Courts have also determined that economic or financial hardship does not justify a variance. When determining whether Page 2 of 3