My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Campground Workgroup Items (6)
Burnett-County
>
Property Files
>
0-MANUAL SCANS
>
0-COUNTY WIDE ITEMS
>
Campgrounds 2021-2022
>
Campground Workgroup Items (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2023 9:13:24 AM
Creation date
3/2/2023 9:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Property Files v2
Document Date
3/2/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I found an influential person with the Wisconsin DNR. They told me that they understood ACT 67 and that <br /> there was a recent action taken in Eastern Wisconsin to stop the abuses from that bill. I received all of that <br /> information and emailed it to all of the board members. My understanding is that none of them read it. The <br /> only action that they took was to forward it to the county administrator. <br /> I managed to gather as much information that I could to divert the effort on our chain of lakes. Our chain of <br /> lakes has 7 small lakes but it is very primitive and the 109 campsites that they were pushing for would have <br /> created a lot of damage to a fairly tranquil chain of lakes. I gathered many examples of local campgrounds <br /> that had violations that they had not addressed BUT were still granted approval for their CUPs. Some of these <br /> campgrounds had septic violations that had gone on for years but the county apparently didn't care.Through <br /> discussing this with many different lake associations, I was told that their group had pointed out known <br /> campground septic issues to Nate Ehalt,the Burnett County administrator(and a member of your BCDA <br /> board) and his comment was something like, "Burnett County has neither the resources to monitor these <br /> septic systems or even care about monitoring these systems." Let's face it, if septic systems fail in these mega <br /> campgrounds and the county doesn't care,this county is going to lose the last decent resource that they have <br /> —natural beauty. <br /> With my many hours of investigation and dealings with other lake groups, I ended last year with a totally <br /> different outlook toward Burnett County. I no longer see this as a place that I can retire to. I no longer want <br /> to spend any more money to improve my property. After finding out that many of the locals don't like cabin <br /> owners, I don't feel compelled to support the local economy. We are going to let the "dust settle" before we <br /> decide if we are going to sell. <br /> Burnett County has wonderful natural surroundings but if I am going to be treated like an outsider but only <br /> acceptable when I can hand out money, we will sell our place and spend our money elsewhere. I just hope <br /> that the county prohibits this wave of campground expansions. If Burnett County doesn't have the time, <br /> money or inclination to monitor septic systems,the quality of the lakes will suffer because it is apparent that <br /> campground owners will not self-regulate. If you lose water quality,then you have squandered your last <br /> decent resource. <br /> I think that it is a great idea for you to reach out to people to try to improve the business environment in <br /> Burnett County, rather than expand more and more campgrounds. As I stated earlier, when you bring in <br /> campers, many of these people bring their own supplies from home. Even if a family of four visited for a week <br /> and spent$200 taxable dollars at local businesses that would provide Burnett County with$1.00. This doesn't <br /> appear to be a sustainable path to grow the county. <br /> Good luck in your efforts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.