My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRUFFNER 03/08/2021
Burnett-County
>
Property Files
>
0-MANUAL SCANS
>
0-FEMA
>
DRUFFNER 03/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2021 1:49:33 PM
Creation date
4/14/2021 1:49:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Property Files v2
Document Date
4/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Towne, Jason <br /> From: Druffner, Jacob D - DNR <jacob.druffner@wisconsin.gov> <br /> Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 11:23 AM <br /> To: Craig Selander <br /> Cc: Towne, Jason <br /> Subject: RE: Floodplain Questions on a Project on Yellow Lake <br /> Hi Craig, <br /> Sorry for the late response as I was trying to ensure I had my ducks in a row with the proposed project and impacts to <br /> floodplain. <br /> I have reviewed the information you have provided.To remove the land from the floodplain, 2-ft of fill will need to be <br /> placed to remove the land from the floodplain and the fill needs to be contiguous to land outside the floodplain. <br /> Additionally and prior to the fill being placed,the floodway/floodfringe needs to be delineated at the proposed project <br /> location. An engineer should make an assessment based on the existing flood insurance study(FIS) model.The modeling <br /> does not need to be re-done to do this. <br /> If the structure is in the floodway, a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis needs to be completed to assess the impacts of <br /> the fill on the regional flood elevation (RFE)as you stated. If the fill doesn't change the RFE, a letter of map revision <br /> (LOMR)would still need to be submitted for to officially remove the structure from the floodplain FEMA maps.The <br /> LOMR would be submitted for post project, in this case I HIGHLY RECOMMEND completing this after the fill is placed not <br /> after the structure is placed. FEMA will need to verify the modeling and effects on the RFE are in agreement with our <br /> approval. <br /> It may be helpful and save time and money in the long run if a CLOMR (conditional letter of map revision) is submitted <br /> before the project begins if there is or is not any change to the RFE with the proposed fill.This would pre-verify that <br /> FEMA agrees with the modeling we approve.That way the fill wouldn't need to be removed if the LOMR/modeling <br /> shows differently than we reviewed and approved. If there is an increase to the RFE a CLOMR has to be submitted for <br /> pre project. <br /> This is probably a bit confusing so please feel free to call if you have questions. <br /> Basic plan moving forward: <br /> 1. Engineer delineates floodway and floodfringe at the location of the proposal. <br /> 2. Is structure/fill to be placed is in the floodfringe, no further modeling necessary and LOMR-F process <br /> can begin. <br /> 3. If structure in the floodway, the existing FIS model needs to be used to determine impacts to RFE. <br /> Model is submitted for DNR review and approval. <br /> 4. If no impacts to RFE, I suggest submitting to FEMA for CLOMR pre-project for verification that modeling <br /> techniques and analyses are correct. Project moves forward. I would highly suggest LOMR should be <br /> submitted for after fill is placed rather than building. If mitigation is needed, this would be cheaper <br /> than altering the structure. <br /> 5. If increase in RFE, CLOMR must be submitted for pre-project and LOMR submitted within 6 months of <br /> project completion for FEMA approval. Again I suggest this being completed after fill rather than <br /> building is placed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.