Laserfiche WebLink
2. ORDINANCE- 15.14 SANITARY PERMITS is subject to 15.06 DEFINITIONS- <br /> County. The Governmental Unit; The Burnett County Zoning Qgpartment. Such that only <br /> stated GENERAL REQUIREMENTS apply— 15.07 COMPLIANCE—wherein is stated in relevant part <br /> "(1) All structures or premises in the County....." Thus the ORDINANCE,in plain English,reads <br /> "Ail structures or premises in the Governmental Unit; The Burnett County Zoning <br /> Department...." are the operative words of the issuing body and judges are bound by those words,any other <br /> application would be felony misconduct in office for legislating from the bench. Now therefore,since plaintiff <br /> failed to deny my land was or is part of the"governmental unit"as perhaps"BURNETT COUNTY <br /> GOVERNMENT CENTER"or"BURNETT COUNTY AIRPORT"would be.Nor am I,Edward Joseph <br /> Cycenas,part of perhaps the"BURNETT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR",the"BURNETT COUNTY BOARD <br /> CHAIRMAN"the"BURNETT COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR JAMES FLANIGAN"and now <br /> "BURNETT COUNTY CORPORATE COUNSEL DAVID L.GRINDELL"are. <br /> 3. Failure to DENY:Plaintiff failed to properly deny and therefore admits no valid <br /> complaint exists.Plaintiff puts forth Ordinance supporting Case Law applicable only in disputes <br /> regarding Navigable Waterways Admitting that Plaintiffs Claim is founded on Navigable Waterways <br /> servitudes and confirming the facts set forth by Myself Edward Joseph Cycenas that the ORDINACE <br /> is not applicable to my land.I have no problem admitting that the several state Wisconsin was granted <br /> from the United States of America rights to the high water mark of those waterways which according to <br /> the original surveys by the United States of America were known as navigable"the basis of the dispute <br /> in TREZEVANT" and the foundation put forth for the STATE OF WISCONSIN'S STATUTES and <br /> Administration Code re Sewers that BURNETT COUNTY has chosen to adopt by ORDINANCE <br /> 15.14.However Plaintiff has failed entirely to put forth any basis that the STATE OF WISCONSIN <br /> could grant the Plaintiff rights that the STATE OF WISCONSIN never had and has failed to show <br /> where regulations the basis of which are NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS would effect the dry land <br /> pertaining to the claim here. <br /> 4. Plaintiff had every opportunity to respond coherently but chose instead to use <br /> obstruction and misdirection to Plaintiffs own detriment in failure to properly deny.All of the other <br /> facts put forth by myself,Edward Joseph Cycenas,under oath are now accepted as facts admitted,these <br /> include,without limitation: <br /> a. That"agent of BURNETT COUNTY James Flanigan trespassed". <br /> b. That"I,Edward Joseph Cycenas,am not part of BURNETT COUNTY/the"governmental unit" <br /> and have received nothing therefrom and owe nothing thereto." <br /> c. That my land,the land pertaining to this action, is not owned by BURNETT COUNTY the <br /> "Governmental Unit". <br /> d. That the pertinent Land Grant made Patent acted and acts as a estoppal/issue preclusion to later <br /> claims by the government and all claiming junior interests thereunder. <br /> e. that"no valid complaint exists that could give rise to the Jurisdictional Exercise of this court against <br /> any free white man of the several state Wisconsin because the Burnett County Land Use Ordinance <br /> clearly defines"County"as The Governmental Unit;the Burnett County Zoning Administration;and,I <br /> am not within the governmental unit;the Burnett County Zoning Administration and whereas, <br /> EDWARD J CYCENAS,and other all capitalized entities have been concocted to kidnap,pillage, <br /> enslave and summarily steal from the free people of the several state Wisconsin." is admitted. <br />